Regulation and Complaints
Supports Albertans and works with their physicians to resolve complaints, favouring an educational or training approach, but applying discipline when necessary.
Service offers:
- review and consideration of written complaints about regulated members
Resolutions may include:
- direct resolve: informal resolution process best suited for single-issue complaints, usually related to practice management or explanation of a medical decision, where physicians are encouraged to work directly with the complainant to resolve the matter; open and honest discussion between both parties helps them to understand the issues and often a simple explanation or apology can close the file; physician and the complainant learn from this process, improving future interactions
- resolve with consent (without investigation): informal resolution process used when the complaint seems straightforward, but one in which the physician needs to provide further explanation to the complainant and CPSA about the care provided, or make a change to their practice. After we get consent from both the physician and the complainant to proceed with this approach, we’ll work directly with the physician to address the complaint. The underlying issue in many of these complaints is poor communication, often around patient consent or follow-up care rather than lack of knowledge or skill. Resolve with Consent enables us to respond quickly to the complaint and allows the physician to explain their care or actions, or implement practice changes sooner
- investigation: a formal process used for complaints that are serious or have complicating factors, such as when the complainant has no authority to receive medical information about the patient; these complaints often involve more than one physician and require additional information from others involved, including medical records; also mandatory for complaints involving a serious allegation of unprofessional conduct, including sexual abuse or sexual misconduct
- resolve with consent (after investigation): a collaborative process with the physician and complainant used when an investigation identifies a problem with the physician’s practice; both the complainant and the physician agree on how it can be resolved, which may include a peer review, assessment and / or educational activities; this quality improvement approach results in better care for future patients
- dismissal (after investigation): occurs when an investigation finds no evidence of unprofessional conduct; when a complaint is dismissed, the complainant can request a review of that decision
- dismissal: sometimes a complaint lacks sufficient information to identify unprofessional conduct, or it’s frivolous or vexatious in nature; in these cases, the Health Professions Act allows the Complaints Director to dismiss it with no further action; when this happens, the complainant can request a review of the dismissal decision
- hearing: disciplinary hearings occur when informal methods of resolution are unsuccessful, or when a complaint investigation reveals a serious breach of a practice standard or ethical conduct by a physician, such as sexual abuse or sexual misconduct